At the panel for Adoption Unfiltered, I spoke about the importance of including pronatalism and NOT adopting in the book that is, actually, about adoption, which I did not "succeed" at.
Here is what I wrote that is basically what I said in my allotted minutes:
Q: Did it surprise you to be asked to contribute your thoughts to an adoption book? Why do you think your viewpoint, and a conversation about pronatalism (Ch 19) – living in a culture that values parents over nonparents – is important in unfiltering adoption?
I am thrilled to be included in the conversation. There is so much out there about adoption success, but so little about walking away. We decided to pursue adoption after years of failed infertility treatments, because it was presented as the next logical step. Also, the thought of NOT being a parent made me want to throw up.
The agency we worked with was endlessly positive, and frequently said “adoption is not if, but when” and “the waiting is the hardest part.” I was not shocked at how many prospective adoptive parents are waiting versus how many babies are “available.” [that number is roughly 1 "available" baby to 55 prospective adoptive parents] We felt that acutely as we waited, and waited; were finally considered, and then were passed over again and again.
The agency’s response to our longer wait was uncomfortable. We were asked to consider private adoption, which we did and swiftly rejected. It would make me the first contact for women in crisis, which I am NOT qualified for (and I was not willing to leave my full-time job as a special education teacher while we waited). Wasn’t that a conflict of interest, since I had “skin in the game?” We were told the private track increases exposure but not necessarily success rates. In the training we were advised to advertise in laundromats and check-cashing places where women in financial crisis frequent. We didn’t feel comfortable with situations where the only thing standing between a woman parenting her baby and us adopting was access to money and services. It felt predatory.
Then, we were encouraged to update and open our “grid,” a comprehensive list of situations, race, legal, and medical info. It makes you feel downright fascist putting down what you can and can’t handle as a parent, but it also encourages an honest look at limitations and supports. The grid is not taken lightly, and our decisions were made after a great deal of painful consideration. To open it beyond our comfort level for the express purpose of being considered more often felt…wrong.
Acquaintances even suggested we lie and include a picture of us in front of a church to appear religious, which might up our chances. If our desire for a baby was the number one factor, if we were willing to become parents at any cost, none of these things would have been a barrier. It seemed the fastest way for us to become parents was to lose ourselves in an unethical swamp.
In that last year before a stress-fueled medical crisis led us to walk away, I had begun reading the adoptee perspective, through the “Flip the Script” publications. While others wondered why I wanted to read unnecessarily sad and angry stories, I found them absolutely necessary. How could I look at adoption as simply the means to the end of having a long-awaited baby, when clearly there are so many long-term ramifications for all involved, especially the adoptee who had no choice?
After reading Adoption Unfiltered, I hope that agencies and prospective adoptive parents will truly listen to all of the perspectives put forth and make change, for the sake of everyone involved.
This. "I think listening to a wide variety of experiences, truly listening not just to respond and try to confirm what you want to believe, but to open your mind to stories that don't match the sanitized, one-sided portrayals of adoption in the media -- that is necessary work." That is all sooo important. You are so completely right, and I'm so glad that the people attending the function - including the adoption agencies - could hear that. It's so terribly important, and moving - monumental even - that someone who didn't get the baby they wanted is the one to talk about that. It certainly doesn't come across as sour grapes.
ReplyDeleteIronically, your emotional EQ (yes, I know that's two emotionals!) and morality and ethics and just sheer awesomeness that would have made you amazing parents is also what led you to consider why "parenting at any cost" was not right for you OR for the birth mom and/or baby. You made the immensely hard decisions because they were right. The "just adopt" brigade never think about that.
Sending loads of love covered in admiration.
Yes to all this, Mali.
DeleteEvery single paragraph is my favorite. But maybe for real real the last one. You are both kickass people and bring it to everything else in your lives. How could you not?
ReplyDeleteFirst of all -- ONE baby for every 55 prospective parents?? WHOA.
ReplyDeleteSecond, thank you for your willingness to speak -- so honestly, and so eloquently! -- about your experiences. Yours/ours is not a perspective that's often heard, and too many people are willing to gloss over (or ignore) those moral and ethical dilemmas you agonized over. And kudos to Lori and her co-authors for including your story and opinions in their book and this event. :)
"the harder it is for you to have a baby, the more ethical conundrums you come up against." I relate to this statement, even though my experiences and outcomes were different than yours.
ReplyDeleteIn my case, it was having a child that made the ethical conundrums more obvious, rather than not having one. My child was so obviously not an object to be acquired, that it led me to question processes that treat a child as an object to be acquired. I can say, in hindsight, I am nothing but grateful that no fertility treatments worked for me. I am nothing but grateful for the brutal honesty of our doctor about the fertility industry and what was involved, though the way she talked seemed insensitive at the time and even a bit creepy. I know that everybody, including me is engaging in a fair bit of self-justification when we reflect on these things. Still, I think it counts for something that I can read your conclusions and agree with the jist of them, despite the differences in how we reached those conclusions, and plenty of other differences.